TechQA.

Question

Should a class-member using-declaration with a dependent qualified-id be a dependent name?

score 2441 · Answer 1 · 2014-11-26 20:58:05

2

Answer

2441

Views

Should a class-member using-declaration with a dependent qualified-id be a dependent name?

2.4k views Asked by willj At 26 November 2014 at 20:58

score 176 · Answer 2 · 2020-10-13 12:57:25

Name resolution when a structure declaration is hidden by a variable

176 views Asked by Vlad from Moscow At 13 October 2020 at 12:57

score 111 · Answer 3 · 2020-10-24 23:36:38

Is a diagnostic required for incorrect uses of non-dependent names in a template that is never instantiated?

111 views Asked by cigien At 24 October 2020 at 23:36

score 123 · Answer 4 · 2020-10-25 21:14:01

Why in a template we can use a dependent name without being already declared if not instantiated?

123 views Asked by Maestro At 25 October 2020 at 21:14

score 121 · Answer 5 · 2014-12-15 08:26:32

Derived template-class access to base-class member-data: for dependent name

121 views Asked by Robin Hsu At 15 December 2014 at 08:26

score 173 · Answer 6 · 2022-04-30 10:19:42

Template name disambiguation: g++ vs clang++

173 views Asked by JtTest At 30 April 2022 at 10:19

score 19382 · Answer 7 · 2009-12-03 14:37:17

template member function of template class called from template function

19.3k views Asked by Ari At 03 December 2009 at 14:37

score 94 · Answer 8 · 2020-09-25 16:04:09

Why isn't this an independent name?

94 views Asked by TRPh At 25 September 2020 at 16:04

score 320 · Answer 9 · 2018-09-18 14:30:59

Why can a dependent name be considered as complete even if the actual type is not defined until the very end

320 views Asked by felix At 18 September 2018 at 14:30

score 87 · Answer 10 · 2018-05-27 02:57:13

Invoking templated member of templated class from within a templated function, with explicit parameter

87 views Asked by Museful At 27 May 2018 at 02:57

TechQA.

List Question

Should a class-member using-declaration with a dependent qualified-id be a dependent name?

Name resolution when a structure declaration is hidden by a variable

Is a diagnostic required for incorrect uses of non-dependent names in a template that is never instantiated?

Why in a template we can use a dependent name without being already declared if not instantiated?

Derived template-class access to base-class member-data: for dependent name

Template name disambiguation: g++ vs clang++

template member function of template class called from template function

Why isn't this an independent name?

Why can a dependent name be considered as complete even if the actual type is not defined until the very end

Invoking templated member of templated class from within a templated function, with explicit parameter

Popular Questions

Popular Tags

Trending Questions