Using Intellij and the lombok plugin version 203.5981.41, when I delombok to see what code is generated I do not get the AtomicReference the lombok GetterLazy docs suggest:
    @Getter(lazy=true)
    private final double[] cached = expensive();
    private double[] expensive() {
        double[] result = new double[1000000];
        for (int i = 0; i < result.length; i++) {
            result[i] = Math.asin(i);
        }
        return result;
    }
Generates this in Intellij:
    private final double[] cached = expensive();
    private double[] expensive() {
        double[] result = new double[1000000];
        for (int i = 0; i < result.length; i++) {
            result[i] = Math.asin(i);
        }
        return result;
    }
Not this as the docs suggest:
private final java.util.concurrent.AtomicReference<java.lang.Object> cached = new java.util.concurrent.AtomicReference<java.lang.Object>();
  
  public double[] getCached() {
    java.lang.Object value = this.cached.get();
    if (value == null) {
      synchronized(this.cached) {
        value = this.cached.get();
        if (value == null) {
          final double[] actualValue = expensive();
          value = actualValue == null ? this.cached : actualValue;
          this.cached.set(value);
        }
      }
    }
    return (double[])(value == this.cached ? null : value);
  }
  
  private double[] expensive() {
    double[] result = new double[1000000];
    for (int i = 0; i < result.length; i++) {
      result[i] = Math.asin(i);
    }
    return result;
  }
Clearly, this is not lazy and so is of limited use, is this a change in how lombok works for lazy getters, or is this a bug in how Delombok works in Intellij?
Or have I done something wrong and should have implemented something else/something I missed?
As pointed out by @chris the issue is with the Lombok plugin in intellij.
                        
This is a limitation of the Delombok feature of the IntelliJ Lombok plugin. It doesn't seem to recognize
lazy=trueon@Getter. Try to verify the behavior with a simple test like this instead, you'll see it works as expected: