I remember hearing that lining up all scope members in the beginning of the block was no longer recommended practice with both C and C++, but does this mean it obstructs the compiler in some way when generating code, or simply that it is no longer necessary to do it, because it is not always convenient? A.K.A is it more efficient for the compiler to generate optimal allocation if locals are declared on demand?
Compilation implications of declaring all scope locals in the beginning as in early C?
206 views Asked by AudioBubble At
1
There are 1 answers
Related Questions in C++
- C++ using std::vector across boundaries
- Linked list without struct
- Connecting Signal QML to C++ (Qt5)
- how to get the reference of struct soap inherited in C++ Proxy/Service class
- Why we can't assign value to pointer
- Conversion of objects in c++
- shared_ptr: "is not a type" error
- C++ template using pointer and non pointer arguments in a QVector
- C++ SFML 2.2 vectors
- Lifetime of temporary objects
Related Questions in C
- C++ using std::vector across boundaries
- Linked list without struct
- Connecting Signal QML to C++ (Qt5)
- how to get the reference of struct soap inherited in C++ Proxy/Service class
- Why we can't assign value to pointer
- Conversion of objects in c++
- shared_ptr: "is not a type" error
- C++ template using pointer and non pointer arguments in a QVector
- C++ SFML 2.2 vectors
- Lifetime of temporary objects
Related Questions in INSTANTIATION
- C++ using std::vector across boundaries
- Linked list without struct
- Connecting Signal QML to C++ (Qt5)
- how to get the reference of struct soap inherited in C++ Proxy/Service class
- Why we can't assign value to pointer
- Conversion of objects in c++
- shared_ptr: "is not a type" error
- C++ template using pointer and non pointer arguments in a QVector
- C++ SFML 2.2 vectors
- Lifetime of temporary objects
Related Questions in COMPILER-OPTIMIZATION
- C++ using std::vector across boundaries
- Linked list without struct
- Connecting Signal QML to C++ (Qt5)
- how to get the reference of struct soap inherited in C++ Proxy/Service class
- Why we can't assign value to pointer
- Conversion of objects in c++
- shared_ptr: "is not a type" error
- C++ template using pointer and non pointer arguments in a QVector
- C++ SFML 2.2 vectors
- Lifetime of temporary objects
Related Questions in LOCALS
- C++ using std::vector across boundaries
- Linked list without struct
- Connecting Signal QML to C++ (Qt5)
- how to get the reference of struct soap inherited in C++ Proxy/Service class
- Why we can't assign value to pointer
- Conversion of objects in c++
- shared_ptr: "is not a type" error
- C++ template using pointer and non pointer arguments in a QVector
- C++ SFML 2.2 vectors
- Lifetime of temporary objects
Popular Questions
- How do I undo the most recent local commits in Git?
- How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
- How do I delete a Git branch locally and remotely?
- Find all files containing a specific text (string) on Linux?
- How do I revert a Git repository to a previous commit?
- How do I create an HTML button that acts like a link?
- How do I check out a remote Git branch?
- How do I force "git pull" to overwrite local files?
- How do I list all files of a directory?
- How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?
- How do I redirect to another webpage?
- How can I iterate over rows in a Pandas DataFrame?
- How do I convert a String to an int in Java?
- Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?
- How do I check if a string contains a specific word?
Popular Tags
Trending Questions
- UIImageView Frame Doesn't Reflect Constraints
- Is it possible to use adb commands to click on a view by finding its ID?
- How to create a new web character symbol recognizable by html/javascript?
- Why isn't my CSS3 animation smooth in Google Chrome (but very smooth on other browsers)?
- Heap Gives Page Fault
- Connect ffmpeg to Visual Studio 2008
- Both Object- and ValueAnimator jumps when Duration is set above API LvL 24
- How to avoid default initialization of objects in std::vector?
- second argument of the command line arguments in a format other than char** argv or char* argv[]
- How to improve efficiency of algorithm which generates next lexicographic permutation?
- Navigating to the another actvity app getting crash in android
- How to read the particular message format in android and store in sqlite database?
- Resetting inventory status after order is cancelled
- Efficiently compute powers of X in SSE/AVX
- Insert into an external database using ajax and php : POST 500 (Internal Server Error)
It used to be mandatory to declare locals up front in C, presumably because it is easier to implement a compiler when that is the case.
These days, the compiler is actually "sufficiently advanced" that this does not make any difference for POD types. Because of this, the question boils down to readability and matters of taste in C.
In C++, however, declaring of locals imply things about the execution of the relevant constructor and destructor and it can have bearing on whether or not the compiler will be able to employ certain optimizations. This means that declaring them all at the top is not equivalent to declaring them on demand, rendering your question mostly invalid for C++.
In C++, declare the variables when it is semantically correct for the program you are trying to write. (And on top of that there are also matters of readability and taste)