Here is the problem link
Approach:
My approach is to simply give every other node the chance to be an in-between node for every 2 pairs of vertices i and j.
Below is my code for Floyd Warshall algorithm:
class Solution{
public void shortest_distance(int[][] mat){
int N = mat.length;
for(int i = 0; i < N; ++i){
for(int j = 0; j < N; ++ j){
for(int k = 0; k < N; ++k){
if(mat[i][k] != -1 && mat[k][j] != -1 && (mat[i][j] == -1 || mat[i][j] > mat[i][k] + mat[k][j])){
mat[i][j] = mat[i][k] + mat[k][j];
}
}
}
}
}
}
This gives wrong answer for the below case:
Input
12
0 4 2 1 2 9 4 8 -1 4 -1 -1
9 0 3 6 2 6 2 3 6 -1 -1 3
7 1 0 10 8 9 1 3 -1 7 -1 10
5 1 9 0 3 -1 1 10 7 1 -1 7
-1 5 1 4 0 2 10 4 10 6 4 5
7 8 3 7 5 0 5 1 3 5 7 2
6 -1 6 1 10 7 0 10 -1 -1 7 7
-1 3 2 7 4 -1 4 0 10 5 6 10
10 6 1 10 4 4 7 10 0 4 7 4
1 1 6 8 8 9 2 10 6 0 -1 3
5 9 3 -1 4 3 -1 -1 -1 3 0 1
2 2 8 6 2 4 4 3 -1 3 4 0
My output
0 2 2 1 2 4 2 5 7 2 6 5
5 0 3 3 2 4 2 3 6 4 6 3
6 1 0 2 3 5 1 3 7 3 7 4
2 1 4 0 3 5 1 4 7 1 7 4
6 2 1 3 0 2 2 3 5 4 4 4
4 4 3 5 4 0 4 1 3 5 6 2
3 2 5 1 4 6 0 5 8 2 7 5
6 3 2 4 4 6 3 0 9 5 6 6
5 2 1 3 4 4 2 4 0 4 7 4
1 1 3 2 3 5 2 4 6 0 7 3
3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 6 3 0 1
2 2 3 3 2 4 4 3 7 3 4 0
Expected Output
0 2 2 1 2 4 2 5 7 2 6 5
5 0 3 3 2 4 2 3 6 4 6 3
4 1 0 2 3 5 1 3 7 3 7 4
2 1 4 0 3 5 1 4 7 1 7 4
5 2 1 3 0 2 2 3 5 4 4 4
4 4 3 5 4 0 4 1 3 5 6 2
3 2 5 1 4 6 0 5 8 2 7 5
6 3 2 4 4 6 3 0 9 5 6 6
5 2 1 3 4 4 2 4 0 4 7 4
1 1 3 2 3 5 2 4 6 0 7 3
3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 6 3 0 1
2 2 3 3 2 4 4 3 7 3 4 0
Note: I have also observed that if I move the k loop out and make it the first loop, it works just fine. I am confused as to what is wrong with my current code.
It is all about states. This is more conceptual than any algorithmic implementation issue here.
As in your code,
The above states, for every pair of nodes
iandj, check if any shortest path exists via every possiblek. However, you are implicitly assuming thatmat[i][k]andmat[k][j]are in already optimized states. This is incorrect as there is no real effort made in the code to bring them to that state.Instead, you need to check for every pair of nodes
iandjvia only 1 value ofkat a time. This is how you would be building the optimized states for every possiblekone by one and the next one depending on the previous one. Hence, the below is correct version for this:Quoting from the
Wiki.Miscellaneous:
Although trivial, but I still think it is worth mentioning that the order of nodes used in the optimization process really doesn't matter. We simply need to shorten the distance(if exists and possible) node by node where every node is an intermediate candidate.